Home TERROR Court dismisses Charles Okah’s no-case submission

Court dismisses Charles Okah’s no-case submission

396
0

The Federal High Court in Abuja has dismissed a nocase submission filed by  Charles Okah and ordered him to open his defence in the terrorism charge filed against him by the Federal Government.

The dismissal of the no-case submission on Thursday  followed another ruling by the court striking out the treason count against the accused.

Charles Okah is the younger brother to ex-leader of the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND), Henry Okah, who is serving life sentence in South Africa jail.

Okah, Nwabueze, Edmund Ebiware and Tiemkemfa Francis-Osvwo (aka General Gbokos) were first arraigned before the court on Dec. 7, 2010 over their alleged involvement in the Oct.  1, 2010 blast which left about 12 people dead and several others injured.

The court had earlier sentenced their co-accused, Edmund Ebiware, to life imprisonment, while the fourth defendant, Tekemfa Francis-Osvwo died in prison.

Delivering ruling on a no-case-submission filed by the defendants, Justice Gabriel Kolawole held that the prosecution counsel, Alex Iziyon had made out a prima facie case linking Okah and Nwabueze with the alleged offence.

READ ALSO  Boko Haram ambush, kill over 40 farmers in Borno

In dismissing the submissions made by the defence counsel, Emeka Okoroafor and Oghenovo Otemu,( counsel to Okay and Nwabueze respectively) the court said, “the prosecution has made out prima facie case through testimonies of witnesses.

The Judge said the witnesses had linked the defendants with the charges and this requires them to offer explanation.

The court further held, contrary to the submissions of the defendants, that the evidence given by the 17 witnesses called up by the prosecution has not been discredited nor fractured to warrant upholding the no-case-submission.

“At this stage of proceeding, court is not required to add probative value to the exhibits or form opinion on evidence adduced by witnesses.

“It is my view, that the testimonies of the witnesses have adduced prima facie case to warrant the 1st and 2nd defendants to enter defence.

READ ALSO  Okah brothers to sue Jonathan, accuse him destabilising Buhari's govt

“The no case submissions made by the defendants are not well founded; defendants are required to enter defence based on the testimonies of the 17 prosecution witnesses,” the court held.

Justice Kolawole adjourned the matter till July 5 and 6 for the defendants to open their defence.

In their submission on April 3, 2017 the defendants had urged the court to uphold their no case submissions.

The defendants cited overwhelming contradictions in evidence of the prosecution witnesses, insisting that there was no credible evidence to prove the allegation against them.

They argued that the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses were badly discredited that no court can rely on them to adjudicate on an issue.

Earlier, the court  struck out one of the counts brought against Okah.

Justice Gabriel Kolawole said he dismissed the treason charge because evidence cited in court did not prove that the President Goodluck Jonathan, who was the Eagle Square, the target of the blast, was intimidated by the attack.

READ ALSO  Five killed in fresh Taraba herdsmen/farmers clash

He said the evidence failed to prove that Mr. Jonathan was sneaked out of the eagle square, venue of the 50th anniversary celebration of Nigeria’s independence.

Mr. Kolawole said the evidence did not prove a case of treason as contained in count one of the charge.

He also said the evidence cited by the prosecution failed to prove that governors who attended a meeting on March 15, 2010 in Warri, Delta State, where another blast occured, were also intimidated.

He however dismissed a no-case submission filed by Mr. Okah and other defendants.

(NAN)

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.